Be Brave, Be A Leader, and Change Agriculture

Mahatma Gandhi – young/old

The challenge the emerging economies are facing is defining the transformation needed and then the execution plan of the transition from an agriculture-based economy to a modern one.

In a previous article, I related thoroughly to the issue Economic Revolutions the humankind has gone through, as well as to the main types of agriculture. It is advised to re-read it [>><<].

The change required in the agri-sector is of a national-historical magnitude and is expected to include and influence directly over 50% of the nation’s population.

Such a historical change requires vision, focus, adherence to the goal, ability to stand up to difficulties and objections, and an unwavering desire to improve the state of the people.

Such a change requires strong leadership, and a person to lead it safely to its destination. Such a person would be engraved in national memory as a leader of historical stature.

This article is a brief guide for leaders who want to understand the long-term deterministic historical processes that significantly affect agriculture and influences the global and local economy.

As we get a better understanding of where we are, and the deterministic fate of economic revolutions, including the Agriculture Revolution, we gain a strategic advantage that enables us to better lead such historical challenging changes. 


In large parts of Africa and Asia, over 50% of the population makes their living from agriculture, working small-size plots, whose average size is 1 to 1.3 hectares.Their daily income is less than $ 5 a day, and often less than $ 1.9 a day. Meaning, they live in poverty. [>><<]
Average farm size in hectare (A), and the rate of employment in agriculture (B).

The goal is to improve all aspects of the LIVELIHOOD, and above all, HAPPINESS.The target is to increase the rate of GDP growth.Emerging economies, as they rapidly develop, wish to see their GDP soar high and fast.

To achieve the above “simple” goal and target they need to involve the agri-sector, which accounts for over 50% of the labor force BUT only 15% of Sub-Sahara Africa GDP. 
Sub-Saharan Africa – agriculture, forestry, and fishing % of GDP [>><<].

Unfortunately, in reality, in many countries, the agri-sector does not support much economic development.

On the contrary, practically it is heavily supported by the state.It slows economic development and makes it difficult to achieve the national economic goals and targets and to realize the nation’s development and progress vision.

Based on the above, no wonder if political leaders and decision-makers are asking themselves if it is even possible to make such a change in today’s reality.

YES, it is possible!

Others have done it not so long ago and you can do it even better now. You can use their experience, tools, methods, knowledge, and above all their economic model, after adjusted, to your country’s unique conditions.But nothing will work, nor move or change, without a dedicated, committed, passionate and loving leader. 
Germany Agriculture Employment went down from nearly 45% in 1882 to 1.4% today. In Israel Agriculture Employment in 2020 is about 0.1%. The result in both countries is a much stronger economy.

Is it correct to use the same terminology and measurements for a farmer whose income is $ 10 per hectare, to a farmer whose income is $ 10,000, or even $ 100,000 per hectare?Are they all ‘Farmers’?

Do they all practice the same kind of ‘Agriculture’?It may be the same if you could consider driving a carriage or a car and an airplane as being similar.

They are not the same – not in shape, usage, and cost – and therefore we use different names to describe each type of ‘Driver’.Similarly, we need anappropriate glossary to describe different types of agriculture and farmers. Let’s start with defining types of agriculture.


12,000 years ago, followed by the disappearance of hunter-gatherers, the agricultural revolution conquered the world by storm.
Since then, agriculture has undergone several evolutions and mainly revolutions that have changed its face unprecedented.Some of the changes are so dramatic that one may wonder and ask himself – “is it still agriculture?”Here are three types of farming that are compatible with the economic revolutions the world has experienced since the Agriculture Revolution (12,000 years ago). 

1) Traditional Agriculture – 

Beginning about 12,000 years ago.Today, most of the low-income farmers still practice Traditional Agriculture.Its purpose is to feed the family, to enable them to survive at the current standard of living.

Most of the world’s poor farmers practice this type of agriculture.Its economy offers very low added-value and sometimes is based on food barter with a typical income per hectare ranging from $ 1 to $ 100.

2) Industrial Agriculture – 

Beginning with the Industrial Revolution – the use of mass production methods started some 250 years ago. Most of the food purchased in markets and supermarkets around the world are manufactured under Industrial Agriculture processes.It creates medium added-value with typical income per hectare ranging from $100 to $10,000.

3) Lifestyle luxury products – its roots are old, but it has received a significant boost in the last 100 years, with the leap of living standards and the demand for specialty products, such as exotic fruits, seafood, medical cannabis, herbs, etc.Agriculture of this kind creates high added-value. The typical income per hectare would range from $10,000 to $100,000.
.For more reading [>><<].

In emerging economies, a large proportion of farmers are still in the phase of Traditional Agriculture, which ultimately doesn’t enable them to economically develop and change their living standards.As presented above, Traditional Agriculture has very different characteristics and outcomes from those of Industrial Agriculture or those of Lifestyle Agriculture.

Therefore, if we want to advance the economy of emerging countries then we need to focus on nurturing the Agri-industry and Lifestyle Agriculture types.Some think that supporting by subsidizing the Traditional Farmers, i.e. giving money to farmers, will help to improve the agri-sector and turn into a self-sufficient, growing, and vibrant sector contributing to grow the country’s economy and achieve its goals.But that never happened before in big scales, and there is a small chance it will ever happen in the future.

By subsidizing, in the best scenario, those farmers will become less poor, but they will continue to request (more and more) of the state support.Under a more realistic scenario, the opposite will happen and farmers will become poorer.Subsidize will sentence these farmers to many more years of poverty.

Farmers will increase their income and will join the middle-class ONLY when they will begin to practice the more advanced types of Agriculture.The subsidized budget can, therefore, be used in a different way to transfer the agri-sector into a far more advanced type of Agriculture.That will result in rapid income increase of hundreds of percent, and a decreased need for state support. A win-win situation.For this to take place, a country needs to lay the proper foundations to enable the Agri-industry revolution.To do so a country needs first to have a BRAVE LEADER.


The structured transition from Traditional Agriculture to a more advanced type of agriculture will lead to long term, unprecedented, economic, and demographic changes.China and its past 40 years history, is such an example; it changed its economy from Traditional to Industrial and with it much of its Agri-sector, which is now much more effectively supporting the life of 1.4B people and even became a strong food exporter.Such a change does not happen by itself. Strong and courageous leadership is needed to lead such a process.A fearless leader having a long-term vision is what agrarian countries should hope and look for. 

To change the agri-sector in emerging economies one needs to:a) Understand the long-term history and economic revolutions and evolution process.b) Have a deep understanding of the current situation in the target country (wishing to change).c) Have a local leader having their genuine dreams of the future of their country with a clear vision, goals, and targets.d) Have a plan of how to carry on the change to reach his goals, and targets within a defined time frame.e) Professional support to integrate the relevant factors, as described above, and design a proper work plan according to a well-defined model.

Did you have enough of doing more-of-the-same? Are you ready to take that gigantic economic leapfrog with your nation or company? Are you ready to move 
From Traditional Agriculture to Agri-industry and beyond!?
If you are from Africa, Asia, Latin America, and thinking of extending or starting fresh produce export, don’t think twice , contact me. The Agricultural Gap is a video series consisting of 43 chapters, each 2 to 10 minutes, in which you get introduced to the long term history story that led to the Agricultural Gap existing today between the emerging economies and the developed ones. The video series includes deep discussion and suggested model to close that gap [>><<].
error: Content is protected !!
Farmers Review Africa
Farmers Review Africa